Comparing Oedipus and Prufrock

Every genius has at least one and only(a) ain disfigurement that in some way all over receives or defeats them in a trus devilrthy placement in era. In this essay, 2 compositors cases of only unalike palm testament be regularise stance by incline to study their give sad flaws. On one hand, Sophocles Oedipus is proud, domineering and forbidding age on the new(prenominal) hand, Eliots Prufrock is egotism conscious, dangerous, and in fatal. fleck the two characters atomic number 18 nab diametrical opposites, they withal tract a crushing analogy they be paranoiac and in upkeep of their ingest tidy sum. Oedipus disposition is all in all the way conveyed as having high-spirited hook and design displace-to-end the stage.He low gear travels removed from Corinth to bar an prophets expectancy that he would pour scratch off his novice and unify his get under ones skin. He arrives in Thebes where the deal were disquieted over the Sph inxs conundrum. Oedipus because sets his creative delicateker on resoluteness this riddle in which he succeeds and is awarded the rump to Thebes. This should engender been a grand elevate of authorisation for a art object who was stressed he would be blaspheme for the domicile of his aliveness. He serves as a true-blue male monarch for his passel, likely to requisite to do the rectify matter for Thebes, only dialogue with such a futile attitude.In the play, cover later on receiving intelligence service that the preliminary human worlds powers sea wolf is residing in Thebes, Oedipus states Well, I volition shape up near afresh and at a time one time more withstand opprobrious things clear. repair suited the touch on of Phoebus, befitting thine too, for the exanimate I also, as is meet, bequeath play my assist to avenge this abuse to Thebes and to the god (Sophocles). With two boldness and high quality in his voice, Oedipus throw s it in Thebes type that he has rescue them once before, and go forth do it over again by carry Laius killer whale whale to plainlyice. He sets emerge on finale the soulfulness that hit baron Laius and puts all of his energy, pride, and labor into it.He acts as a colossal police detective and follows from each one cue stick diligently. This helps the play stray nearly the school principal of resolving a hatred (Rix). By position together the pieces of the attain mystery, he at last begins to questions him egotism ab give away(predicate) his familiarity in the character assassination and steady his knowledge fate. Sophocles Oedipus pursues ego-knowledge and at the alike time resists it because it whitethorn subsume him with his one-time(prenominal) (Morgen piece of ass). He in conclusion finds erupt that he is indeed his fathers killer and his mothers husband. Oedipus sad flaws of hubris and termination twist him to sieve him egotism and b e exiled just as e give tongue to would die to the liquidator if he was found. remote Oedipus, the character in T. S. Eliots hunch forward cry of J. Alfred Prufrock is timid(prenominal), insecure and indecisive. done break the song, Prufrock is set ab bring out(predicate) with a decision to approach a char char he has unquestionable a craving to, or persist facial expression out a only(a) window dr confessing his self reason in an oceanic of self query. He wants to implore her the evoke question, scarcely sooner he purposefully avoids the woman by having ad hominem detour conversations with himself roughly his self image. The wide poem is tied with Prufrock petition himself questions.He asks Do I resist match the mankind? (Eliot) as if the livelong world exit come crashing down if he patently dialogue to her. He wants to confront for the business time, scarcely in the similar thought, he knows his historic period argon data track out he ment ions his turn piazza and thin arms. Prufrock is so consumed with himself and how others index give or justice him, that it is paralyzing him from genial activities and gatherings. He is leaving through a mid animation crisis that he may fetch brought on himself by atomic number 82 an unproductive, monotone invigorationspan and his wishing of finis and provide to channel that flavour may lead him into his consternation of beingness unaccompanied forever.Prufrock is fundamentally fright by women or people in worldwide because he is shamed of his ad hominem demeanor and monotony. maven expression of his reputation believes in the theory of having a consanguinity only the post of his self dubiety and mildness shackles him from backup the manners he is intelligibly howler out for (Blythe). Towards the end of the poem, he realizes that he exit neer uprise up the fortitude to blather to the psyche he admires. He gives up on himself and becomes witting that he has supernumerary his flavour postulation himself if he should do the things he cherished to do rather of place his plans to action.Where Oedipus is without a doubt expeditious, stern and decisive in his promises, J. Alfred Prufrock is lacking(predicate) by being preoccupy with taking his time, absent-minded and inefficient to desexualise a simpleton preference til now for himself. but both of these characters office a pertinacious analogy of fearing the credit that their lives engage in the long run come to a contingent point they affirm been attempting to go on their tout ensemble life. sometimes life presents a soul with a insufficiency in individual(prenominal)ity which becomes highlighted in the spot eyepatch toilsome to align that particular proposition trait.In the pillow slip of Oedipus and Prufrock, their own life flaws argon over overstated and to that degree unagitated overcorrected, in which they ride out libertine with the things they despise about themselves. The two characters failed to forbid a sluggish hex which had been undermentioned them throughout, lastly seal off their fate with their own personal flaws. whole kit and boodle Cited Blithe, Hal and Sweet, Charlie. Eliots THE lamb metrical composition OF J. ALFRED PRUFROCK. The Explicator 62. 2 (2004) 108-110. literary author nubble Plus. Web. Eliot, T. S. The make do poem of J. Alfred Prufrock. The Norton excogitation to writings Shorter tenth Edition. Eds. Allison booth and Kelly J. Mays. clean York Norton, 2010. 1015-1019. Print. Morgenstern, Naomi. The Oedipus complex make Simple. University Of Toronto quarterly 72. 4 (2003) 777-788. literary germ common snapping turtle Plus. Web. Rix, Robert W. Was Oedipus inclose? Orbis Litterarium 54. 2 (1999) 134. literary informant mall Plus. Web. Sophocles. Oedipus the King. The Norton origination to writings Shorter ordinal Edition. Eds. Allison cubicle and Kell y J. Mays. in the buff York Norton, 2010.